BMJ  2007;334:1037-1039 (19 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39196.666377.BE

Analysis

Functional foods: the case for closer evaluation

Nynke de Jong, project director functional foods, postlaunch monitoring, risk-benefit analyses1, Olaf H Klungel, associate professor2, Hans Verhagen, head of centre for nutrition and health1, Marion C J Wolfs, scientific coworker1, Marga C Ocké, project director, food consumption surveys1, Hubert G M Leufkens, professor of pharmacoepidemiology2

1 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, Netherlands, 2 Utrecht University, Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands

Correspondence to: N de Jong Nynke.de.Jong@rivm.nl

Current regulations focus on the mandatory safety evaluation of functional foods before they come to market, but Nynke de Jongand colleagues argue that the effects of such foods should also be evaluated after they have been launched

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Functional foods are modified foods that claim to improve health, quality of life, or wellbeing. These foods are intended for use in the context of a healthy lifestyle or as a means to compensate for an unhealthy one. From society's point of view, there are several potential problems—the medicalisation of our daily food intake, the long term safety and effectiveness of these foods, and the aggressive marketing and advertising of these highly profitable products.1 However, functional foods need to be fully evaluated to make sure they meet current scientific and regulatory standards.

EU regulations

Several European Union regulations and directives on functional foods are currently being developed. Current rules focus mainly on the mandatory safety evaluation of new foods before they come to market; minimum and maximum safe upper values for micronutrients used for fortification; lists of permitted substances for fortification; the registration of herbal products; and acceptable nutritional and health claims.2

. . . [Full text of this article]

Market positioning of functional foods versus drugs


Possible food and drug interactions


Limited postlaunch scientific data


The case for postlaunch monitoring


Summary points

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Functional foods
Tim Lang
BMJ 2007 334: 1015-1016. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Serum cholesterol concentration and death from suicide in men: Paris prospective study I
Mahmoud Zureik, Dominique Courbon, and Pierre Ducimetiere
BMJ 1996 313: 649-651. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lang, T. (2007). Functional foods. BMJ 334: 1015-1016 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Drugs or Functional Foods ?
Dr Harsha Kumar H N, et al.
bmj.com, 19 May 2007 [Full text]
Re: Drugs or Functional Foods ?
Eddie Vos
bmj.com, 21 May 2007 [Full text]
Functional foods and statins
Gilbert R. Thompson
bmj.com, 31 May 2007 [Full text]
Prospective studies testing relevant clinical endpoints are needed
Oliver Weingartner
bmj.com, 11 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Re: Functional foods and statins
Nynke de Jong, et al.
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Functional Foods: Already a feature of every-day practice
Ian R Wallace
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview