Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1019 (19 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39213.445856.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Alho et al conclude: "Tonsillectomy is an effective alternative for adults with a documented history of recurrent episodes of pharyngitis,"1 but this assertion is unsupported by the evidence presented.
For those who had the early operation, the combined time with a sore throat including the operation was four days greater than for those whose operation was deferred.
People who were offered early tonsillectomy had fewer swabs taken than people given late tonsillectomy (5/36 v 20/34, P<0.0001). Yet, in the people who took swabs, there was little difference between positivity rates for group A streptococcal infection (1/5 samples (intervention) v 8/20 (control), P>>0.1). This comparison is still biased, albeit differently from the one reported in the paper.
The authors also say: "A substantial improvement over time in the rate of episodes of pharyngitis occurred in the control group during the follow-up, probably because of the natural course of the disease."1 Isn't
Tim J B Crayford, director of public health
Croydon Primary Care Trust, Croydon, Surrey CR0 9XT
tim@crayford.net
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care