Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1013-1014 (19 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39212.467037.BE
These greatly increase the risk of cancer, but the diagnosis is still rare
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A new diagnosis of cancer is rare in primary care, and the role of general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing cancer can be challenging. In the United Kingdom, a GP with a list size of 1500 will on average see only 1.39 cases of lung cancer, 0.23 oesophageal cancers, 0.99 colorectal cancers, and 0.45 renal or bladder cancers each year.1 We seek to diagnose the few patients with cancer out of the many who are concerned about it or who have non-specific problems. In this week's BMJ, a cohort study by Jones and colleagues assesses the association between alarm symptoms and a subsequent diagnosis of cancer in just under 800 325 patients in primary care.2
Diagnostic errors are one of the leading causes of medicolegal claims against GPs,3 and they can damage the faith of our patients. However, we have a role as gatekeepers of health resources and more recently
Robin Fox, general practitioner, John Fletcher, general practitioner, clinical epidemiologist, BMJ
Health Centre, Bicester, Oxon OX26 6AT
Robin.Fox@gp-K84052.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses