Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:967 (12 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39204.997616.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Glasziou (previous letter) pleads for a description of what clinicians and patients need to do. It is not simply about adding salt at the dinner table but about understanding the considerable role that players such as the food industry play in public health.1 Health protection through national fiscal and legislative policies should have a higher priority than health promotion interventions applied to general, primary care, and workforce populations.
The high risk strategy, the traditional medical approach to prevention, identifies individuals at high risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease events who are then offered behavioural or pharmacological interventions. In contrast, the population strategy seeks to control the determinants of incidence in the population as a whole.2
Public health policies need to take into account the role that agriculture, trade, education, the physical environment, town planning, and transport have on cardiovascular disease aetiology. Political action is needed to change urban planning, education, and
M Justin S Zaman, clinical research fellow in epidemiology
University College London, London WC1E 6BT
j.zaman@ucl.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses