Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:917 (5 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39199.468287.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Since my editorial explaining how the denial of failed asylum seekers' access to free hospital care violates their fundamental human rights was published, there has been a deafening silence from the BMA.1 Yet the BMA has a proud record of promoting human rightsits website claims that "Action by medical associations ... to ensure that resources [reach] the most vulnerable populations, have played an important role in supporting the realisation of the right to health."2 Not for over 400 000 failed asylum seekers living in the UK, it hasn't.
In contrast, the parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights recently recommended that free secondary health care be provided "to comply with the laws of common humanity and the UK's international human rights obligations," and an innovative Department of Health policy document that requires health professionals to respect human rights acknowledges the government's responsibility to comply with international treaties.3 4 The BMA's reticence, given
Peter Hall, chair, Doctors for Human Rights
Pasque Hospice, Luton LU3 3NT
peterhall@doctorsforhumanrights.org