Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:910-911 (5 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39197.577442.80
Such support for patients at home cuts admissions to hospital for heart failure
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Several randomised trials have established that disease management programmes offering, for example, home visits, heart failure clinics, and telephone interventions result in better adherence to treatment and reduced admissions to hospital for heart failure than standard care for people with heart failure.1 2 3 4 Current evidence is unclear, however, on the impact of such programmes on mortality, all cause admissions, quality of life, and cost reduction. The most effective components of the interventions and the benefits to different subgroups are also unknown. Moreover, such evidence comes from small trials with short follow-up, performed at single centres, that applied complex strategies to selected high risk populations. These characteristics might affect both the internal and external validity of the trials' findings. In this week's BMJ, Clark and colleagues present a meta-analysis that includes 14 trials of telephone interventions in heart failure; it shows an overall 21% reduction in admissions for heart failure (but
Hugo O Grancelli, director of cardiology department1, Daniel C Ferrante, research projects coordinator2
1 Departamento de Cardiología, Instituto FLENI, Montañeses 2325 (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2 Fundación GESICA, AV. Rivadavia 2358 PB 4 (1034), Buenos Aires
hgrancelli@fleni.org.ar
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.