BMJ  2007;334 (5 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39203.526481.47

Editor's Choice

Editor's choice

For patient or population?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Two weeks ago, a Head to Head in the BMJ asked whether you should tell patients about treatments that they can't have. Robert Marcus' resounding "yes" (BMJ 2007;334:826-7 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39171.426690.AD) centred on the premise that doctors owe a primary duty to the patient rather than the state. But how long can this untrammelled advocacy for the individual survive?

Doctors should not "connive with any external agency to deceive patients," wrote Marcus. The rapid responses agreed, and one of them, published this week as a letter, takes the argument a step further. Patients should not only be made aware of treatments that they can't have, says radiotherapist Michael Williams (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39199.440104.3A), but of the risks of delaying treatments they can have. For patients with cancer, true candour means informing them of the adverse effects of waiting times on their prognosis. Failure to communicate these serious risks to patients, . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Recurrent pharyngo-tonsillitis

Paul Little
BMJ 2007 334: 909. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ignorance is a public health issue

Michael V Williams
BMJ 2007 334: 915. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Nearly all English general practices are set to run their own budgets

Zosia Kmietowicz
BMJ 2007 334: 922. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should patient groups accept money from drug companies? Yes

Alastair Kent
BMJ 2007 334: 934. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

NICE appraisals should be everybody's business

Jane Wells and Claire Cheong-Leen
BMJ 2007 334: 936-938. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults: randomised controlled trial

Olli-Pekka Alho, Petri Koivunen, Tomi Penna, Heikki Teppo, Markku Koskela, and Jukka Luotonen
BMJ 2007 334: 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should you tell patients about beneficial treatments that they cannot have? Yes

Robert Marcus
BMJ 2007 334: 826. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Rights and Duties

Robert E Marcus
bmj.com, 4 May 2007 [Full text]

Legal Obligation to Inform Patients about "Unavailable" Treatments

Kayvan Shokrollahi
bmj.com, 7 May 2007 [Full text]

Treating a patient when not cost effective: a moral dilemma highlighted by neuroscience!

Sebastien TASSY, et al.
bmj.com, 9 May 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>