Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:831-832 (21 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39161.403218.AD
Tom Treasure, professor of cardiothoracic surgery1, Martin Utley, reader in operational research2, Ian Hunt, specialist registrar in thoracic surgery1
1 Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, 2 Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London
Correspondence to: T Treasure Tom.Treasure@ukgateway.net
Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is common practice, but Tom Treasure, Martin Utley, and Ian Hunt question the strength of evidence behind advice from NICE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
New treatments are usually thoroughly evaluated before they enter clinical practice, but much of what doctors do is based on experience rather than evidence. However, just because a practice is widely accepted within the profession does not guarantee that it is effective; there are many historical examples, such as the practice of copious and repeated blood letting, which persisted from antiquity well into the mid-19th century.1 In recognition of this, last year the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) launched an initiative to identify interventions delivered by the NHS that do not benefit patients.2
Of course, to reject the experience and insight of generations of clinicians as "low grade evidence" and subject everything we do to randomised controlled trials would be hugely wasteful and impractical. Many existing practices should be retained and new ideas introduced because the benefits are large and evident without further study.
The question
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+