Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:814 (21 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39185.460243.3A
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Data on alcohol hand rubs and Clostridium difficile are scant and controversial.1 Bettin et al evaluated the efficacy of liquid soap v chlorhexidine gluconate in 4% alcohol to decontaminate bare or gloved hands inoculated with an epidemic strain of C difficile, and found that the two agents did not differ significantly in residual counts of C difficile on bare hands, but on gloved hands soap wash was more effective.2 Studies on the impact of the introduction of alcohol hand rub policy on C difficile incidence are also controversial. Gopal Rao et al found a consistent, though not significant, reduction in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and C difficile associated diarrhoea.3 King found a reduced MRSA incidence and an increased C difficile incidence,4 and Boyce et al found essentially no change in the incidence of C difficile infection.5
Nicola Petrosillo, director, Alessandro Capone, doctor
Second Infectious Diseases Division, National Institute for Infectious Diseases, 00149 Rome, Italy
petrosillo@inmi.it
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care