Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:759 (14 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39169.547512.80
An imperfect measure of a modest predictor of response to antidepressants may not be ready for clinical application
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patients' responses to treatment with antidepressants vary greatly. The largest study on the effectiveness of antidepressants to date suggested that roughly one third of patients will recover fully given a long enough trial, one third will improve substantially, and one third will fail to respond.1 A subset in all three groups will have adverse effects such as sexual dysfunction, insomnia, nausea, and weight gain. Side effects are rarely dangerous, but they cause many patients to discontinue treatment, often after a single prescription.2
Similar concerns exist for many drugs, not just antidepressants. What makes antidepressants especially frustrating for clinicians and patients is the lack of factors to predict how individual patients will respond to a given treatment. We know that one third of patients will have minimal improvement, but we have few data to guide selection of alternative treatments. Indeed, while the psychiatric literature abounds with reports of clinical predictors, the
Roy H Perlis, director of pharmacogenomics research
Depression and Bipolar Clinical and Research Programs, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
rperlis@partners.org
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.