BMJ  2007;334:710 (7 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39169.894398.1F

Letters

Impact factors

The dark side

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Martyn's tongue in cheek advice to the new editor of a prestigious—if fictional—journal is to raise the impact factor by various measures including "resist[ing] any sympathy when a paper is submitted on an unfashionable condition such as deafness."1 As a psychiatrist working with deaf sign language users I was delighted to see, at last, a mention of deafness in a prestigious—and non-fictional—journal.

My teams' attempts at getting articles published in mainstream journals have been met with responses such as "not of general interest" and "there is a misspelling with Deaf spelt with a capital D" (this is the recognised name for culturally deaf sign language users). My personal favourite is a review of a paper on adapting an instrument into British Sign Language: "I would expect that particularly among deaf people an interview poses difficulties because of the sensory handicap, and the most logical choice would be to use or . . . [Full text of this article]

Helen E J Miller, consultant psychiatrist, National Deaf Service

London SW12 9HW

helen.miller@swlstg-tr.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Advice to a new editor
Christopher Martyn
BMJ 2007 334: 586. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ