BMJ  2007;334:705-706 (7 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39155.658843.BE

Editorials

The 2006 WHO child growth standards

Have implications for nutrition programmes in emergencies

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In April 2006, the World Health Organization released its new WHO child growth standards,1 16 years after a WHO working group on infant growth recommended that these standards should describe how children should grow rather than how they actually grow.2 The basis for the new growth standards was six population based studies of infants and children from Ghana, India, Norway, Brazil, Oman, and North America, undertaken between 1997 and 2003. Participants were fed according to accepted international nutritional standards (including breast feeding), and their mothers were adequately nourished and avoided known adverse factors such as tobacco exposure.

The new growth standards show that children born in different regions of the world can and should grow equally well, and they also show that sex and ethnic origin are minor determinants of growth compared with adequate nutrition, environment, and health.2 However, as expected, important differences in the diagnosis of malnutrition emerge when . . . [Full text of this article]

Martin Bloem, chief of nutrition

World Food Program, Rome 00148, Italy

Martin.Bloem@wfp.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Operational implications of using 2006 World Health Organization growth standards in nutrition programmes: secondary data analysis
Andrew Seal and Marko Kerac
BMJ 2007 334: 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ