Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:652 (31 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39164.423449.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We are committed to the development of a professional medical workforce, able to contribute to national health, wealth, and knowledge creation. To achieve this we must identify and nurture a strong cadre of clinical academics for the future, building on the opportunities afforded by the recent UK funding schemes. It has therefore been particularly disappointing that the new system of application to specialist medical training (MTAS) has paid scant regard to the determinants of academic potential.1
Academic traineesthose doctors wishing to pursue careers that encompass research as well as patient carehave been particularly badly affected by the decision to anonymise applications and deprive the assessors of details of previous clinical and research experience. These trainees, who are among the brightest of their generation, are a precious commodity.
Without a scientifically informed and research oriented medical workforce throughout the country, the government's vision of the UK as a world class centre
J Bell, president1, John Tooke, chair2
1 Academy of Medical Sciences, London SW1Y 5AH, 2 Council of Heads of Medical Schools, London WC1H 9HD
nick.hillier@acmedsci.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+