Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:651-652 (31 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39164.420150.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Smith et al's conclusion of threefold to fourfold increased mortality in a second twin when born vaginally at term is a relative rather than an absolute risk.1 There was an excess second twin all cause mortality of 73 infants, and an excess second twin anoxic mortality of 60 infants. Altogether there were nearly 100 000 births, but the preterm rate (higher in twin births) was not stated, so there might have been 90 000 full term confinements. This gives an increased mortality for the second twin of 0.8 per 1000 births, and an increased anoxic mortality for the second twin of 0.67 per 1000 births. If caesarean section successfully avoided all the second twin mortality, 1250 caesarean sections would be needed to save one infant. If caesarean section were only successful in preventing anoxic deaths, 1500 caesarean sections would be needed to save one infant. Although this large number of
Christopher Cheetham, consultant paediatrician (retired)
High Wycombe HP13 6QW
kimcheetham@btopenworld.com