Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:600 (24 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39156.570208.FA
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In debating whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) should evaluate complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), neither side cites the two recent systematic reviews showing the cost effectiveness of certain treatments in certain conditions.1 2 3 4
Fourteen exemplary studies indicated that the following CAM therapies may be considered cost effective compared with usual care: acupuncture for people with migraine; manual therapy for people with neck pain; spa therapy for people with Parkinson's disease; self administered stress management for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy; preoperative and postoperative oral nutritional supplementation for patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal tract surgery; biofeedback for patients with "functional" disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome; and guided imagery, relaxation therapy, and potassium rich diet for patients with heart disease.3 4 Last year, acupuncture for chronic low back pain was added to the list.5 All these interventions are safe and popular with patients. Is it relevant that the only
Charlotte Paterson, senior research fellow
Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter EX1 2LU
charlotte.paterson@pms.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses