Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:599 (24 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39156.553565.FA
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We must not lose sight of the potential of universal patient record access to fundamentally change the quality of consultations.1 The key step in any consultation is to reach a shared understanding of the problem with the patient: expectations, hopes, and fears are identified and what can and cannot be done explicitly is discussed and acted on.2 In a series of educational assessments of the consultation skills of volunteer experienced UK general practitioners, the most common recommendation for improvement was identifying the patient's reasons for consulting (77% of participants)3 and the fourth most common was collaborating with the patient in agreeing management plans (23% of participants; unpublished data), vividly demonstrating that the achievement of shared understanding can be improved.
When patients can assess the records we make of their consultations, the gap between their agendas and our actions will become explicit and a powerful catalyst for us to improve our
Robert K McKinley, professor of academic general practice1, Richard H Baker, professor of quality of health care2
1 Keele University Medical School, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, 2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP
r.k.mckinley@hfac.keele.ac.uk