Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:599 (24 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39156.550833.FA
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Richards makes a strong plea for full access to personal records online.1 However, the main danger of such access is not too much information for the patient or a threat to medical hegemony but rather to vulnerable people who may not be able to control access to the record. For example, could a mildly cognitively impaired elderly parent prevent a well meaning, but somewhat overbearing, daughter or son scanning his or her record and possibly discovering treatment for a sexually transmitted disease or a termination of pregnancy that had been long forgotten? Would an abused wife really be able to stop her husband accessing her record to find out her history or what she may have said to the doctor about him?
For thousands of years patients have been secure in the knowledge that their doctors would vigorously defend their secrets regardless and that they could safely tell them anything.
Brian H McKinstry, senior researcher
Community Health Sciences: General Practice Section, Edinburgh EH8 9DR
brian.mckinstry@blueyonder.co.uk