BMJ  2007;334:547-548 (17 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39153.580023.80

Editorials

Reed Elsevier's arms trade

Scientific communities must work together to prevent the sale of arms

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In a recent editorial in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Richard Smith drew attention once again to the paradoxical and disturbing association between Reed Elsevier, a huge global publishing company, and the international arms trade.¹ While promoting world health through its publications, including the Lancet, Reed Elsevier also organises international trade fairs for the arms industry. By facilitating the sale of armaments, Reed Elsevier is directly implicated in causing untold damage to health. This hypocrisy is well illustrated by Smith's "absurd" example of an imaginary tobacco company that publishes health journals to increase tobacco sales. Sadly, his example is neither absurd nor imaginary. In 2005, an article in the Lancet reported undisclosed relations between the tobacco industry and the health related journal Indoor and Built Environment.²

Reed Elsevier's purpose in publishing the Lancet and other health related journals is not to covertly support arms . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ BMJ Clinical Evidence, London WC1H 9JR , ² BMJ, BMA House

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Editorial misses the point

Laurie R Davis
BMJ 2007 334: 652. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

It's a hatchet job

Christopher E Nancollas
BMJ 2007 334: 652. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

News
BMJ 2007 334: 389. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Global information flow

Fiona Godlee, Richard Horton, and Richard Smith
BMJ 2000 321: 776-777. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Armstrong, E. J.L. BSc (2007). Reed Elsevier's arms business. CMAJ 177: 606-606 [Full text]  
• Butler, C., Castleden, W., Ruff, T., Westberg, G., Corra, L. (2007). A call for publishers to declare their conflicts of interest. JRSM 100: 355-355 [Full text]  
• Armstrong, E., on behalf of the Global Health Advocacy Project, (2007). Taking the lead against Reed Elsevier. JRSM 100: 256-256 [Full text]  
• Davis, L. R (2007). Editorial misses the point. BMJ 334: 652-652 [Full text]  
• Nancollas, C. E (2007). It's a hatchet job. BMJ 334: 652-652 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Health care and education: a business oriented profession !

Amr Hassan El-Shalakany
bmj.com, 16 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Hatchet Job

Christopher E Nancollas
bmj.com, 17 Mar 2007 [Full text]

BMJ, The Lancet and Reed Elsevier’s arms show business

Xavier Bosch
bmj.com, 18 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Missing the Point

Laurie R Davis
bmj.com, 21 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Encouraging the sale of arms is unacceptable

Jack J Marsden
bmj.com, 21 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Re: competing interests and the"legitimate" defence industry

Gayle L. Davies
bmj.com, 24 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Reed Elsevier and the conflicts of interest of publishers

Colin D Butler, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Publishers' competing interests

Trish Groves
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Reed Elsevier

John M Graham
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Reed Elsevier's arms trade just tip of an ethical iceberg.

David K Hillebrandt
bmj.com, 5 Apr 2007 [Full text]

Reed Elsevier selling on of arms fairs

Celia Rutherford
bmj.com, 27 Jul 2007 [Full text]