Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:510 (10 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39146.615081.59
Tessa Richards, assistant editor, BMJ
trichards@bmj.com
Full access to personal health records should be a right, not a privilege
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Few doctors would disagree that continuity of care matters, or that recent changes in medical training and practice have reduced it. Those who have escaped the frustration of dealing with a patient who has run the gauntlet of professional opinion and whose notes are "missing" lead a charmed existence.
Never mind professionals' frustration; what about the patient's? When illness, or fear of it, prompts a patient to consult a doctor, it's often a high stakes event. When the doctor has no access or limited access to the records, and the patient can't provide the relevant details, it's stressful to say the least.
I speak from the heart. As patient and patient advocate, my medical odyssey has taken me to more than a dozen hospitals and GP surgeries across England over the past three years. Not in pursuit of second opinions, but because of the way we live and the nature
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses