Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:486-487 (10 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39141.622917.80
Is not related to the time taken to conceive, or exposure to environmental agents
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In 2005, the BMJ published a paper suggesting that subfertile couples were more likely than fertile couples to have boys.1 This observation was offered as support of the hypothesis that sperm bearing Y chromosomes swim faster through viscous cervical mucous. In the flurry of letters that followed, other researchers reported that their data did not support the sex ratio finding.2 Furthermore, the sperm swimming hypothesis was exposed as a persistent myth.3
In this week's BMJ, Joffe and colleagues4 pool data from several large fecundity studies, further confirming the lack of association between secondary sex ratio (boys to girls at birth) and time to pregnancy. On this point, we are confident the authors are correct. However, their hypothesis that the sex ratio could be a marker of adverse effects on the male reproductive system is less certain. They suggest that a slight decline over time in the secondary sex ratio
Jens Peter Ellekilde Bonde, professor of occupational medicine1, Allen Wilcox, senior investigator2
1 Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, DK 8000 Aarhus, Denmark, 2 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA
jpbon@as.aaa.dk
Read all Rapid Responses