BMJ  2007;334:485-486 (10 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39141.417454.80

Editorials

Researching a good death

Raises difficult issues, but many patients are keen to participate

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this week's BMJ, a qualitative study by Kendall and colleagues assesses the challenges in conducting research in people nearing the end of life.¹ The study—conducted in researchers, people with cancer, and carers—provides a landmark in a challenging area, as well as offering encouragement for future researchers. It finds that many patients do wish to participate in research, and that researchers, while appreciating the challenges of conducting research in this area, think that it is no more demanding than in other areas. The study also offers potential solutions to the barriers to carrying out such research. These take the form of a useful checklist to be consulted before designing any study intended to research a good death.

A central moral point of the study is that patients must not be paternalistically excluded from researching a good death, because research can enrich the lives of participants. This perspective reflects the . . . [Full text of this article]

Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1278 Tower Road Site, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 3S9

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study

Marilyn Kendall, Fiona Harris, Kirsty Boyd, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A Murray, Duncan Brown, Ian Mallinson, Nora Kearney, and Allison Worth
BMJ 2007 334: 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Charlton, R., Currie, A. (2008). A UK Perspective on Worldwide Inadequacies in Palliative Care Training: A Short Postgraduate Course Is Proposed. AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 25: 63-71 [Abstract]