BMJ 2007;334:455-459 (3 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE
Analysis
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
Neil C Campbell, reader1,
Elizabeth Murray, director, e-health unit2,
Janet Darbyshire, director3,
Jon Emery, professor of general practice4,
Andrew Farmer, university lecturer5,
Frances Griffiths, associate professor6,
Bruce Guthrie, professor of primary care7,
Helen Lester, professor of primary care8,
Phil Wilson, senior clinical research fellow9,
Ann Louise Kinmonth, professor of general practice10
1 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen AB25 2AY,
2 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London N19 5LW,
3 MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA,
4 School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, Claremont, Australia ,
5 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF,
6 Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL,
7 Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF,
8 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester M13 9PL,
9 Section of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 9LX,
10 General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2SR
Correspondence to: N Campbell n.campbell@abdn.ac.uk
Determining the effectiveness of complex interventions can be difficult and time consuming. Neil C Campbell and colleagues explain the importance of ground work in getting usable results
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Complex interventions are "built up from a number of components, which may act both independently and interdependently."1 2 Many health service activities should be considered as complex. Evaluating complex interventions can pose a considerable challenge and requires a substantial investment of time. Unless the trials illuminate processes and mechanisms they often fail to provide useful information. If the result is negative, we are left wondering whether the intervention is inherently ineffective (either because the intervention was inadequately developed or because all similar interventions are ineffective), whether it was inadequately applied or applied in an inappropriate context, or whether the trial used an inappropriate design, comparison groups or outcomes. If there is a positive effect, it can be hard to judge how the results of the trial might be applied to a different context (box 1).

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Effect of tailored practice and patient care plans on secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial
- A W Murphy, M E Cupples, S M Smith, M Byrne, M C Byrne, J Newell, and for the SPHERE study team
BMJ 2009 339: b4220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
- Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally Macintyre, Susan Michie, Irwin Nazareth, and Mark Petticrew
BMJ 2008 337: a1655.
[Full Text]
-
Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial
- Ellen D Hodnett, Robyn Stremler, Andrew R Willan, Julie A Weston, Nancy K Lowe, Kathleen R Simpson, William D Fraser, Amiram Gafni the SELAN (Structured Early Labour Assessment and Care by Nurses) Trial Group
BMJ 2008 337: a1021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation
- Alan Shiell, Penelope Hawe, and Lisa Gold
BMJ 2008 336: 1281-1283.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
- Michelle Campbell, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Haines, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Peter Sandercock, David Spiegelhalter, and Peter Tyrer
BMJ 2000 321: 694-696.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases
- Jon Emery, Robert Walton, Michael Murphy, Joan Austoker, Pat Yudkin, Cyril Chapman, Andrew Coulson, David Glasspool, and John Fox
BMJ 2000 321: 28-32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients
- Jon Emery, Robert Walton, Andrew Coulson, David Glasspool, Sue Ziebland, and John Fox
BMJ 1999 319: 32-36.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Murphy, A W, Cupples, M E, Smith, S M, Byrne, M, Byrne, M C, Newell, J, for the SPHERE study team,
(2009). Effect of tailored practice and patient care plans on secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ
339: b4220-b4220
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Joosten, T., Bongers, I., Janssen, R.
(2009). Application of lean thinking to health care: issues and observations. Int J Qual Health Care
21: 341-347
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Wilson, P, Minnis, H, Puckering, C, Gillberg, C
(2009). Should we aspire to screen preschool children for conduct disorder?. Arch. Dis. Child.
94: 812-816
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Bhattacharyya, O., Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M.
(2009). What Is Implementation Research?: Rationale, Concepts, and Practices. Research on Social Work Practice
19: 491-502
[Abstract]
-
Russell, A., Heckler, S., White, M., Sengupta, S., Chappel, D., Hunter, D. J., Mason, J., Milne, E., Lewis, S.
(2009). The evolution of a UK regional tobacco control office in its early years: social contexts and policy dynamics. HEALTH PROMOT INT
24: 262-268
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Absetz, P., Oldenburg, B., Hankonen, N., Valve, R., Heinonen, H., Nissinen, A., Fogelholm, M., Talja, M., Uutela, A.
(2009). Type 2 Diabetes Prevention in the Real World: Three-year results of the GOAL Lifestyle Implementation Trial. Diabetes Care
32: 1418-1420
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Clark, A. M., Savard, L. A., Thompson, D. R.
(2009). What is the strength of evidence for heart failure disease-management programs?. J Am Coll Cardiol
54: 397-401
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Grande, G, Stajduhar, K, Aoun, S, Toye, C, Funk, L, Addington-Hall, J, Payne, S, Todd, C
(2009). Supporting lay carers in end of life care: current gaps and future priorities. Palliat Med
23: 339-344
[Abstract]
-
McPherson, K. M, Kayes, N., Weatherall, M., on behalf of all members of the Goals-SR Research,
(2009). A pilot study of self-regulation informed goal setting in people with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil
23: 296-309
[Abstract]
-
Grande, G
(2009). Palliative care in hospice and hospital: time to put the spotlight on neglected areas of research. Palliat Med
23: 187-189
-
De Rijdt, T., Willems, L., Simoens, S.
(2009). Transparent and reproducible reports of economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy services: A goal for the future?. Am J Health Syst Pharm
66: 443-444
[Full text]
-
O'Cathain, A.
(2009). Editorial: Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences: A Quiet Revolution. Journal of Mixed Methods Research
3: 3-6
-
Cook, S., Chambers, E., Coleman, J. H
(2009). Occupational therapy for people with psychotic conditions in community settings: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
23: 40-52
[Abstract]
-
Cupples, M E, Byrne, M C, Smith, S M, Leathem, C S, Murphy, A W
(2008). Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in different primary healthcare systems with and without pay-for-performance. Heart
94: 1594-1600
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Linke, S., McCambridge, J., Khadjesari, Z., Wallace, P., Murray, E.
(2008). Development of a Psychologically Enhanced Interactive Online Intervention for Hazardous Drinking. Alcohol Alcohol
43: 669-674
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Cupples, M. E, Smith, S. M, Murphy, A. W
(2008). How effective is prevention in coronary heart disease?. Heart
94: 1370-1371
[Full text]
-
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M.
(2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ
337: a1655-a1655
[Full text]
-
Hodnett, E. D, Stremler, R., Willan, A. R, Weston, J. A, Lowe, N. K, Simpson, K. R, Fraser, W. D, Gafni, A., the SELAN (Structured Early Labour Assessment and,
(2008). Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial. BMJ
337: a1021-a1021
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Thomas, S, Fayter, D, Misso, K, Ogilvie, D, Petticrew, M, Sowden, A, Whitehead, M, Worthy, G
(2008). Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. Tobacco Control
17: 230-237
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Fan, E., Needham, D. M.
(2008). The Science of Quality Improvement. JAMA
300: 390-391
[Full text]
-
Shiell, A., Hawe, P., Gold, L.
(2008). Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ
336: 1281-1283
[Full text]
-
Brown, C, Hofer, T, Johal, A, Thomson, R, Nicholl, J, Franklin, B D, Lilford, R J
(2008). An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions. Qual Saf Health Care
17: 158-162
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Slade, M., Gask, L., Leese, M., McCrone, P., Montana, C., Powell, R., Stewart, M., Chew-Graham, C.
(2008). Failure to improve appropriateness of referrals to adult community mental health services--lessons from a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract
25: 181-190
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Krones, T., Keller, H., Sonnichsen, A., Sadowski, E.-M., Baum, E., Wegscheider, K., Rochon, J., Donner-Banzhoff, N.
(2008). Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Shared Decision Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Fam Med
6: 218-227
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Murray, S. A, Boyd, K., Campbell, C., Cormie, P., Thomas, K., Weller, D., Kendall, M.
(2008). Implementing a service users' framework for cancer care in primary care: an action research study. Fam Pract
25: 78-85
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Protheroe, J., Bower, P., Chew-Graham, C.
(2007). The use of mixed methodology in evaluating complex interventions: identifying patient factors that moderate the effects of a decision aid. Fam Pract
24: 594-600
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Schroeder, K., Fahey, T.
(2007). Improving adherence to drugs for hypertension. BMJ
335: 1002-1003
[Full text]
-
Delaney, B.
(2007). Economic analysis and complex randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract
0: cmm054v1-cmm054
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Patient preference and trials of complex interventions
- Hasnain M Dalal, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Mar 2007
[Full text]
- Do we need more or fewer trials?
- Jim McCambridge, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Apr 2007
[Full text]
- Complex intervention trials need careful consideration of context, cost and management
- Margaret E Cupples, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Apr 2007
[Full text]
- Confusing the concepts of complicated and complex
- Carmel M Martin, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Jul 2007
[Full text]