Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:392-394 (24 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39118.480023.BE
Ian Roberts, clinical coordinator CRASH-2 trial, Richard Smith, visiting professor, Stephen Evans, professor of pharmacoepidemiology
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Correspondence to: I Roberts Ian.Roberts@Lshtm.ac.uk
Patients are receiving treatment that may be unsound as investigations by Ian Roberts and colleagues raise questions about whether influential trials of high dose mannitol ever took place
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Each year, worldwide, many thousands of people are treated in emergency departments for head injuries. Mannitol is an osmotic diuretic that is believed to reduce intracranial pressure after head injury and may improve patient outcome. Between 2001 and 2004, a Brazilian neurosurgeon Julio Cruz and colleagues published three clinical trials comparing high dose and conventional dose mannitol in the treatment of head injury (table
).123 No other trials had examined this question.
The results showed that high dose mannitol greatly reduced death and disability six months after the head injury. A Cochrane systematic review that included these trials concluded: "high dose mannitol seems to be preferable to conventional dose mannitol in the acute management of comatose patients with severe head injury."4 However, one of the trials was accompanied by an editorial that questioned the reliability and validity of the results, calling for further multicentre studies.5 A subsequent investigation by the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses