Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:381 (24 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39128.703692.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Royal College of Radiologists welcomes the chief medical officer's editorial on reducing harm from radiotherapy.1 In the five years to April 2006, only 211 incidents of a dose greater than intended were reported under the IR(ME) regulations.2 Many of these were correctable by adjusting subsequent treatment. Patient injury is a rare event; this is as it should be for a non-emergency treatment given routinely to patients with an established diagnosis.
In June 2006 the Royal College of Radiologists set up a multidisciplinary working party to identify measures to prevent and mitigate errors in radiotherapy. One of the main obstacles to this work is the culture of secrecy surrounding radiotherapy incidents. The system for reporting radiotherapy incidents in the United Kingdom is dysfunctional: the results of inquiries are secret; there is no dissemination of learning; errors are repeated; and public confidence is eroded.1 Most of the incidents reported under the
Michael V Williams, dean
Faculty of Clinical Oncology, Royal College of Radiologists, London W1B 1JQ
michael_williams@rcr.ac.uk