BMJ  2007;334:338-340 (17 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39119.519664.BE

Feature

Drug industry sponsorship

Who's funding WHO?

Michael Day, freelance journalist

London

miday@f2s.com

WHO guidelines state that it will not accept money from drug companies, but how rigorous is it in enforcing this? Michael Day investigates

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Serious questions have been raised about whether the World Health Organization is using patient groups as a conduit for receiving proscribed donations from the pharmaceutical industry. Email correspondence passed to the BMJ seems to show that in June 2006 Benedetto Saraceno, the director of WHO's department of mental health and substance abuse, suggested that a patient organisation accept $10 000 (£5000; {euro}7000) from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) on WHO's behalf. The sum was then to be passed on to WHO—ostensibly with the intention of obscuring the origins of the donation. GSK withdrew its offer of funding when it learnt that acceptance was conditional on obscuring its origin. However, the email exchange indicates that other sums of money originating from drug companies may have already been channelled to WHO through patient groups.

When asked about this correspondence, Dr Saraceno told the BMJ that his email to the patient organisation was "clumsily worded" and . . . [Full text of this article]

WHO guidelines


Backtracking


Funding pressure



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

World Health Organization refutes allegations
Christine McNab
BMJ 2007 334: 440. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Controversies revisited
Jane Smith
BMJ 2007 334: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kent, A. (2007). Should patient groups accept money from drug companies? Yes. BMJ 334: 934-934 [Full text]  
  • McNab, C. (2007). World Health Organization refutes allegations. BMJ 334: 440-440 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Response from World Health Organization
Christine McNab
bmj.com, 21 Feb 2007 [Full text]
Unfair and hasty conclusions
Rangaswamy Thara
bmj.com, 22 Feb 2007 [Full text]
How wrong can the BMJ be?
Leon Eisenberg
bmj.com, 22 Feb 2007 [Full text]
BMJ goes for the glitz
Mitchell G Weiss
bmj.com, 22 Feb 2007 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview