Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:316 (10 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39111.694884.94
Marianne Falconer, specialist registrar, Desmond O'Neill, associate professor
1 Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin
arhc@amnch.ie
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In his analysis of the challenge of simultaneously assisting and engaging in a respectful way with groups of differing status in society, the sociologist Richard Sennett reflected on why respectwhich, unlike food, costs nothingis in such short supply.1 One answer lies in the language we use. Listening to the wishes of clients and patients with disability or of a different ethnicity has led to a more sensitive use of language in encounters with people from these groups.
Older people, who not only are key clients of health services but also experience ageism as a widespread and potent barrier to adequate health care,2 have clearly signalled their wishes to be addressed in respectful terms. In a Europe-wide survey they have articulated a preference for "older" or "senior" as the defining adjectives for their demographic grouping.3 They also said which terms they deemed unacceptable: "elderly," "aged," and "old," with a particularly forceful
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+