Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:185 (27 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39105.430058.59
Tessa Richards, associate editor, BMJ
trichards@bmj.com
Clarifing the legal framework for cross border care is in everyone's interests
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Romania and Bulgaria celebrated their debut into the European Union with fireworks. Britain greeted their accession with newspaper features warning of labour markets being swamped by yet more eastern Europeans, doctors and nurses among them, of course. Nothing surprising thereBritain has honed Euroscepticism into an art form. What it has arguably been less good at, not least in the health arena, is interacting constructively with the Brussels institutions. Their processes may be Byzantine, but understanding them is necessary to influence their decisions.
Admittedly it has not been easy. Until recently the EU has consistently stated that health services were a matter for national governments. As a result, few health professionals anticipated how the medical landscape would be changed by EU legislation enshrining the right to free movement of goods, services, and people. Fewer still foresaw the massive revolution that the "48 hour" European Working Time Directive would trigger.
But there
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses