BMJ  2007;334:127-129 (20 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68

Analysis

Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions

Rafael Perera, senior research fellow in statistics1, Carl Heneghan, deputy director1, Patricia Yudkin, reader in medical statistics2

1 Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, 2 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford

Correspondence to: pat.yudkin@dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Making the what, when, and who of non-drug treatments easier to understand would benefit researchers and readers

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Complex interventions consist of several separate components combined to produce a desired outcome.1 Evaluation of such interventions in randomised trials will generally lead to complex comparisons between trial groups.2 Moreover, text descriptions in journal articles may obscure aspects of the interventions in the trial and hinder comparison between them. To counter these problems we have produced a single image that presents the components of all interventions in the trial and compares different treatment arms. The aim is to clarify the structure of the contrasted interventions and thus aid interpretation of the trial results.

We studied 169 randomised trials of non-drug interventions in primary care published between 1999 and 2003. We searched Medline, PSIQInfo, Bioabstracts, and Embase using the free text search terms "randomised controlled trials" and "primary care" and their synonyms, and excluding the term "placebo" appearing in the title or abstract; we also hand searched reference lists of retrieved . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial
Pat Hoddinott, Jane Britten, Gordon J Prescott, David Tappin, Anne Ludbrook, and David J Godden
BMJ 2009 338: a3026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
Paul Glasziou, Emma Meats, Carl Heneghan, and Sasha Shepperd
BMJ 2008 336: 1472-1474. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture
Charlotte Paterson and Paul Dieppe
BMJ 2005 330: 1202-1205. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Effects of community based nurses specialising in Parkinson's disease on health outcome and costs: randomised controlled trial
Brian Jarman, Brian Hurwitz, Adrian Cook, Madhavi Bajekal, and Alison Lee
BMJ 2002 324: 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Holbrook, A., Thabane, L., Keshavjee, K., Dolovich, L., Bernstein, B., Chan, D., Troyan, S., Foster, G., Gerstein, H., for the COMPETE II Investigators, (2009). Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. CMAJ 181: 37-44 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Merrall, E. L. C., Bird, S. M. (2009). A Statistical Perspective on the Design of Drug-Court Studies. Eval Rev 33: 257-280 [Abstract]  
  • Robb, S. L., Carpenter, J. S. (2009). A Review of Music-based Intervention Reporting in Pediatrics. J Health Psychol 14: 490-501 [Abstract]  
  • Hoddinott, P., Britten, J., Prescott, G. J, Tappin, D., Ludbrook, A., Godden, D. J (2009). Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338: a3026-a3026 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Delaney, E K, Murchie, P, Lee, A J, Ritchie, L D, Campbell, N C (2008). Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: a 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Heart 94: 1419-1423 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barkin, S. L., Finch, S. A., Ip, E. H., Scheindlin, B., Craig, J. A., Steffes, J., Weiley, V., Slora, E., Altman, D., Wasserman, R. C. (2008). Is Office-Based Counseling About Media Use, Timeouts, and Firearm Storage Effective? Results From a Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics 122: e15-e25 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., Shepperd, S. (2008). What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?. BMJ 336: 1472-1474 [Full text]  
  • Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., for the CONSORT Group, (2008). Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 148: 295-309 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Phillips, B. (2007). Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 644-644 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ