BMJ  2007;334:109 (20 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39094.381366.1F

Letters

National Sickness Service

Fundamental problem is not lack of preventive care

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

I do not recall from my training in the United Kingdom meeting as many patients who are utterly disenfranchised, disempowered and disinterested in their health, as so many of my patients are here in the US. I work in a clinic that sees almost entirely uninsured or underinsured patients. It seems that years of being unable to afford care, of worrying about paying rent or buying their children clothes, leaves people too exhausted to be concerned with even their current state of health, let alone their wellbeing in 10 or 20 years. I agree with Heath that the solution to healthcare disparity across classes is the eradication of social and economic disparity.1 And even if poor people enjoyed the same health as the rest of society, would it still be OK to be poor? The answer is of course no.

On the Venn diagram of preventive medicine and a National . . . [Full text of this article]

Richard J Lyus, resident in family medicine

1 Swedish Providence Family Medicine, 550 16th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122, USA richard.lyus@swedish.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In defence of a National Sickness Service
Iona Heath
BMJ 2007 334: 19. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Prevention is better than cure
Somasundari Gopalakrishnan
bmj.com, 24 Jan 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ