BMJ  2007;334:19 (6 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39066.541678.B7

observations

LIFE AND DEATH

In defence of a National Sickness Service

A reconstituted National Health Service that prioritises prevention of sickness would fail all those who are ill now

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It has become commonplace to describe our current healthcare arrangements as a National Sickness Service and to call for a transformation to a genuine National Health Service that would prioritise prevention above cure. This is the sort of facile sloganeering, beloved of politicians and policymakers, that systematically ignores the implications of the rhetoric. The proposed transformation is already shifting the focus of health care away from the needs of the sick towards those of the well, from the old to the young and from the poor to the rich. Is this really what we want or need?

Societies fail whenever someone who succumbs to a treatable illness causing pain, suffering, or premature death is unable to avail themselves of effective treatment because of the lack of money to pay for it. In the context of heightened social solidarity immediately after the second world war, UK society set out to ensure . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Fundamental problem is not lack of preventive care

Richard J Lyus
BMJ 2007 334: 109. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Proposal strikes at the heart of medicine

Andrew N Bamji
BMJ 2007 334: 109-110. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lyus, R. J (2007). Fundamental problem is not lack of preventive care. BMJ 334: 109-109 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Well said Iona Heath!

AN Ghanem
bmj.com, 5 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Agreed: the fundamental problem is not a lack of preventive care.

Richard J Lyus
bmj.com, 5 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Preventing ill health or averting the path to financial ruin and misery for all

Nagpal Hoysal
bmj.com, 5 Jan 2007 [Full text]

No defense needed.

Christopher Buttery
bmj.com, 6 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Promoting health?

Dr Dominic C Horne
bmj.com, 9 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Sickness will never go away

Kevin Pearce
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2007 [Full text]

In defence of a National Health Service

David C Taylor-Robinson, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2007 [Full text]

SIt is stopping disease in the villages

Anne Savage
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2007 [Full text]

National Sickness versus National Health.

Alexander SD Spiers
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Treating sickness is a doctor's first priority

Peter G Davies
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Quite right

Diane-Marie Campbell
bmj.com, 13 Feb 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>