Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1226 (9 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39055.658762.59
Daniel Sokol
1 Keele University
daniel.sokol@talk21.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
On my office wall hangs "The Conjurer," a painting by the 15th century Dutch artist Hieronymus Bosch. On the right side of the canvas, a conjurer holds a small ball between his fingertips. On the other side of the table a gowned spectator, bent over like a hunchback, stares idiotically at the small ball. Behind the spectator, hidden from the stares of the diverted crowd, the conjurer's accomplice is stealing the spectator's purse.
Like the spectator in Bosch's painting, the modern medical ethicist is at risk of losing something of considerable value. By focusing so closely on the little ballthe purely philosophical aspects of medicine (such as the meanings of autonomy)the ethicist too easily ignores the broader context in which these issues arise. The combination of abstruse theorising and ignorance of practical medicine alienates the very people the ethicist is trying to help.
To be of any use to practitioners,
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses