Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1221-1222 (9 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39051.728738.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I agree with many of Waxman's points, but one size does not fit all.1 The efficacy and potential physical harm of someone self administering coffee enemas is different from that of someone receiving aromatherapy for improvement of general wellbeing. A distinction needs to be made between "complementary" and "alternative'' therapies. The psychological and spiritual domains are as important to many patients as their objective response to treatments.
Rather than being a "battle," for many patients their experience of cancer treatment is a helplessly passive one. Accessing complementary therapies can be an empowering experience regardless of the anticipated benefits. If 80% of patients are seeking out additional or alternative therapies, we need to equip ourselves with a knowledge and evidence base from which to advise patients. The websites often warn patients that doctors will disparage the use of their product, and we have a responsibility not to push our patients towards
Simon I R Noble, senior lecturer in palliative medicine
1 Cardiff University and Royal Gwent Hospital NP20 2UB simon.noble@gwent.wales.nhs.uk