Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1131 (2 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39044.369745.BE
Probably heralds a much more sophisticated web resource
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Thousands of computer systems targeted at medical diagnosis (often described as expert systems) have been developed during the past 50 years. Most have had relatively little impact on day to day clinical practice; for example, because they are not easily accessible at the point of care; have a complex interface; can deal with only a narrow focus (one symptom or clinical problem); are not integrated with clinical information systems; depend on particular software or hardware platforms; or require labour intensive construction and are therefore expensive to maintain and extend.
In this week's BMJ a study by Tang and Ng assesses the effectiveness of a web search engine (Google) as a diagnostic aid.1 Using general purpose web search engines as a diagnostic aid is new, although using computers to aid diagnosis is not. The article has provoked a widespread response, with one daily newspaper concluding that "Researchers have found that a
Martin Gardner, research fellow (martin@dcs.gla.ac.uk)
1 Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.