Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1122-1123 (25 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39037.696759.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The recent editorial by Landis et al has added confusion rather than clarity to the issue of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in association with the use of bisphosphonates.1 They do not distinguish between the use of very high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates (monthly pamidronate or zoledronate) to treat patients with malignancy, and the use of much lower doses of bisphosphonates (approximately 1/12 of the oncology dose) in the treatment of Paget's disease or osteoporosis. These two different uses of bisphosphonates have been associated with different risks for ONJ. The authors quote an incidence of 1-10% for ONJ in association with bisphosphonates.1 However, they fail to indicate that this estimate relates to people with malignancy treated with high dose intravenous bisphosphonates. They also refer to ONJ as "avascular osteonecrosis of the jaw".1 ONJ is not usually termed "avascular" since reduced vascularity has not been proved to be an aetiological factor
Mark J Bolland, Andrew Grey, associate professor of medicine, Ian R Reid, professor of medicine
1 Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
m.bolland@auckland.ac.nz