Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1083-1084 (25 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39030.418229.BE (published 17 November 2006)
The Department of Health's new model agreement raises questions about the NHS's relation with industry
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Good clinical research is hard to do at the best of times, and there is a growing perception that the regulatory environment is making it increasingly difficult to plan and carry out clinical trials within a realistic time frame. A recent editorial in the BMJ claimed that the 2004 European Union clinical trials directive has hindered this process.1 Anyone who has tried to carry out a clinical trial, particularly a multicentre one, knows only too well the frustrations of seemingly endless negotiations during the review process. While research may be a moral dutyw1 in our search for better ways of caring, we must always be on guard against using patients and volunteers as a means to an end, as the TGN1412 tragedy recently emphasised.2
On 30 October 2006, the Department of Health announced that a model clinical trials agreement had been finaliseda remarkable achievement that should be welcomed by all
Michael D E Goodyear, assistant professor
1 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9
MGoodyear@dal.ca