Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:954-958 (4 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39002.389236.BE
Patrick F van Rheenen, consultant paediatrician1, Bernard J Brabin, professor of tropical child health2
1 Paediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands, 2 Emma Children's Hospital-Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Correspondence to: P F van Rheenen p.f.vanrheenen@gmail.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is little agreement among doctors and midwives about the optimal time to clamp the umbilical cord after birth. The most important points of difference relate to maternal and infant safety. Many healthcare workers worldwide tend to clamp the cord and pass the baby off as quickly as possible. Infants in resource poor settings are the main victims of immediate clamping, as this prevents a cost-free means of boosting their small iron stores.
Infant anaemia is common in poor communities, especially where malaria is endemic. In sub-Saharan Africa more than 75% of infants are anaemic before 6 months of age.w1-w3 Infant anaemia is associated with increased mortalityw4 w5 and with impaired mental and motor development.w6 Its prevention is of critical importance, and delaying clamping of the umbilical cord could be an effective strategy to reduce anaemia and improve child survival.
We propose a practice guideline on cord clamping for resource poor
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses