Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:918 (28 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7574.918-c
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
EDITORDrugs to prevent the onset of diabetes in patients at risk work. However, they seem to be less effective than intensive lifestyle interventions. The authors point to intensive programmes involving up to 16 one to one sessions to promote healthier behaviour and correctly ask if those standards are economical to offer to larger populations.1 A further concern is whether healthy behaviour is maintained after active intervention has ceased. Comparing both approaches misses one point. Many patients would opt for the soft way of taking a pill when given the choice. Financial resources in medicine all over the world are increasingly restricted, and rationing will ask questions about effectiveness, appropriateness, and justice. Health behaviour modification fits all three categories, and if patients were to have no choice but to take part in a well balanced lifestyle intervention its effectiveness would be even greater.
Philipp Andreas Conradi, general practitioner
Otto-Dix-Ring 98, 01219 Dresden, Germany pconradi@hotmail.com
Read all Rapid Responses