Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:918 (28 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7574.918-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe introduction of routine reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate with every serum creatinine requested seems to have led to three outcomes in general practice: worried patients, increased workload, and confused clinicians.1
Although the national service framework for renal services does not say that estimated glomerular filtration rate should be used as a screening tool for renal disease among unselected patients, but rather should be used to give further information about patients already known to be at risk of renal disease, this is effectively what has happened. In common with other doctors, general practitioners request baseline biochemistry in situations ranging from investigation of symptoms, to "work-up" of known disease, to monitoring of long term illness, and so on. Of the 30 estimated glomerular filtration rates in my practice lablinks inbox recently that originated from unselected patients of varying health, social class, and ethnic origin, 18 were less than
Jo Richardson, general practitioner
London E14 3BQ jo.richardson@GP-F84710.nhs.uk