Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:753 (7 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7571.753-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORSpencer et al say that instrumental delivery may reduce the caesarean section rate in the second stage of labour.1 Although this may be important for the 2006 NHS budgetsaving anaesthetic, operating theatre, and hospital costs in the short termthe longer term health outcomes and costs of a high forceps delivery are concerning and go unmentioned.
| |||||||||||
Recognised third and fourth degree perineal tears occur in 0.5-6% of vaginal deliveries in the western world.2 3 A further 30-44% are estimated to be unrecognised.1 One of the most significant factors, clinically and statistically, to be associated with perineal injury is an instrumental delivery.2 3
Up to a quarter of women with a tear will experience faecal incontinence.3 Although perineal injury during childbirth may not be the sole factor for faecal incontinence, perineal damage increases its likelihood.3 The economic costs of faecal incontinence are large, lifetime cost estimates ranging from £7000
Michelle J Thornton, consultant colorectal surgeon
Wishaw General Hospital, Wishaw ML2 0DP Michelle.Thornton@lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk