Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:719 (7 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7571.719
Andrew Jack, pharmaceutical correspondent
Financial Times
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Aggressive lobbying of government ministers by drug companies seeking to overturn the judgments of the body that advises on the use of treatments by the NHS in England and Wales has had little effect on its decisions.
Minutes of civil service meetings obtained by the Guardian (Sep 28, p 1) under freedom of information laws show that during the eight months to May this year senior executives from 10 drug companies met ministers to criticise the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Since its creation seven years ago NICE has been attacked by drug companies, doctors, and patients' groups whenever it recommends against reimbursement of new drugs in the NHSlargely on the grounds that their relative effectiveness is modest or their cost excessive.
An international consensus is growing that to improve health and tackle escalating healthcare costs a more systematic "health technology assessment" is needed of precisely the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?