Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:713-714 (7 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.38922.502361.80
Quality measures and performance indicators may reduce this toll
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patients who have emergency surgery, especially those with comorbidities, have a high risk of adverse outcomes. Of 20 000 reported surgical deaths, most occurred within days of emergency or major surgery.1 Pneumonia was the most common cause of death (www.ncepod.org.uk/pdf/200304DeathData.pdf), and suggests that organ (lung) failure can progress rapidly in susceptible people.
Recent initiatives, such as the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Deaths (under the auspices of the Patients Safety Agency), aim to reduce morbidity and mortality after emergency surgery. The multidisciplinary Improving Surgical Outcomes Group has also released a document with the same aims.2 It describes system changes (such as better preoperative assessment) and interventions (such as non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output3) that will help patients reach the far end of their "surgical journey" alive and well.
Current systems for assessing risk preoperatively are of variable effectiveness. Traditional clerking often fails to prioritise
Craig Morris, consultant in intensive care medicine and anaesthesia
Ulster Hospital, Belfast BT16 1RH
(cmorris@doctors.org.uk)
Conn Russell, consultant in intensive care medicine and anaesthesia
Ulster Hospital, Belfast BT16 1RH
Read all Rapid Responses