Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:692-693 (30 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38978.380000.68
Paul Emery, head1, Jane Freeston, specialist registrar in rheumatology1
1 Academic Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds LS7 4SA
Correspondence to: P Emery p.emery@leeds.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Adult onset Still's disease is a difficult clinical diagnosis. There are few, if any, diagnostic features, with the possible exception of a very high ferritin concentration. Sivakumar and colleagues describe a not atypical case history of a patient presenting with fever.1 Not unnaturally, the patient was assumed to have an infection. This is understandable and correct, as missing infection could clearly have had serious consequences. For every patient with adult onset Still's disease there are a significant number of patients with severe infection, and it is crucial that infection is the first diagnosis to be excluded.
The persistence of the fever after treatment was the first clue that the patient may have something other than infection. Development of a rash was perhaps the first concrete clue to her diagnosis. Her raised ferritin concentration was highly suggestive, although very high concentrations are more specific. The problem with the Yamaguchi diagnostic criteria
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+