Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:652 (23 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7569.652-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn their clinical review of acute appendicitis Humes and Simpson point out that complications can occur after removal of a normal appendix.1 To decrease the rate of negative appendicectomies, the use of diagnostic laparoscopy followed by either laparoscopic or open appendicectomy may be beneficial. Diagnostic laparoscopy allows the doctor to leave a normal looking appendix, identify alternative pathologies, or accurately site a small incision for open appendicectomy.
| |||||||||||
We audited 187 diagnostic laparoscopies for suspected acute appendicitis over two years in a district general hospital where diagnostic laparoscopy is routine and found 141 diagnostic laparoscopies (75%) proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy while the remaining 46 patients (25%) had a macroscopically normal appendix, and no appendicectomy was performed. Hospital stay and complications following laparoscopic appendicectomy were favourable compared with open appendicectomy, and outcomes were similar regardless of grade of operating surgeon. Controversy persists over the safety of leaving a "normal" looking
Faheez Mohamed, specialist registrar, general surgery
University Hospital of North Durham, Durham DH1 5TW faheez@btinternet.com
Kevin K Khoo, clinical research fellow
Wansbeck General Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland NE63 9JJ