BMJ  2006;333:613-614 (23 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.DE

Editorial

Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour

Better training in instrumental delivery may reduce rates

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Despite much discussion of the increase in elective caesarean rates over the past 20 years,1 w1 little attention has been paid to the rise in second stage caesarean section rates. The maternal risks of second stage caesareans include major haemorrhage, longer hospital stay, greater risk of bladder trauma, and extension tears of the uterine angle leading to broad ligament haematoma.2 Although second stage caesarean section is sometimes appropriate, many could be prevented by the attendance of a more skilled obstetrician.

Currently, obstetric trainees perform most of the second stage trials of instrumental delivery. A recent UK study found that decisions made by consultant obstetric staff are important in determining whether a second stage caesarean section is the optimum method of delivery for women with delay in advanced labour.3 The investigators found substantial differences between consultants' and specialist registrars' opinions on factors affecting safe vaginal delivery—such as position of the fetal . . . [Full text of this article]

Chris Spencer, consultant obstetrician

St John's Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 9BG

Deirdre Murphy, professor

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Coombe Women's Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Susan Bewley, consultant obstetrician

Women's Services, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
(susan.bewley@gstt.nhs.uk)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: Consider the value of a functionally intact perineum
Michelle J Thornton
BMJ 2006 333: 753. [Extract] [Full Text]

Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: Revisit the past
Dermot Ryan
BMJ 2006 333: 753-754. [Extract] [Full Text]

Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study
Rachna Bahl, Bryony Strachan, and Deirdre J Murphy
BMJ 2004 328: 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Singh, M., Varma, R. (2008). Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 10: 38-41 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thornton, M. J (2006). Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: consider the value of a functionally intact perineum.. BMJ 333: 753-753 [Full text]  
  • Ryan, D. (2006). Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: revisit the past.. BMJ 333: 753-754 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Awaiting the new generation of trained obstetricians
David JR Hutchon
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2006 [Full text]
Revisit the past
Dermot Ryan
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2006 [Full text]
Reducing second stage Caesarean Sections - need for a multi-pronged attack
Parivakkam S Arunakumari
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2006 [Full text]
Is the functionally intact female perineum less valuable than a reduced caesarian section rate?
Michelle J Thornton
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2006 [Full text]
A device to make labour assessment more objective
Andrew D Weeks
bmj.com, 6 Oct 2006 [Full text]
Caesarean Delivery in the Second Stage of Labour: An Indian Perspective
Nirmala Rai, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2006 [Full text]
Better training in instrumental delivery may reduce caesarean section rates
John Kelly, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2006 [Full text]
Re: Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour (Spencer et al BMJ 2006; 333: 613-4)
Joan Melendez, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ