BMJ 2006;333:613-614 (23 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.DE
Editorial
Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour
Better training in instrumental delivery may reduce rates
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Despite much discussion of the increase in elective caesarean rates over the past 20 years,1 w1 little attention has been paid to the rise in second stage caesarean section rates. The maternal risks of second stage caesareans include major haemorrhage, longer hospital stay, greater risk of bladder trauma, and extension tears of the uterine angle leading to broad ligament haematoma.2 Although second stage caesarean section is sometimes appropriate, many could be prevented by the attendance of a more skilled obstetrician.
Currently, obstetric trainees perform most of the second stage trials of instrumental delivery. A recent UK study found that decisions made by consultant obstetric staff are important in determining whether a second stage caesarean section is the optimum method of delivery for women with delay in advanced labour.3 The investigators found substantial differences between consultants' and specialist registrars' opinions on factors affecting safe vaginal deliverysuch as position of the fetal . . . [Full text of this article]
Chris Spencer, consultant obstetrician
St John's Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 9BG
Deirdre Murphy, professor
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Coombe Women's Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Susan Bewley, consultant obstetrician
Women's Services, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
(susan.bewley@gstt.nhs.uk)

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: Consider the value of a functionally intact perineum
- Michelle J Thornton
BMJ 2006 333: 753.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: Revisit the past
- Dermot Ryan
BMJ 2006 333: 753-754.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study
- Rachna Bahl, Bryony Strachan, and Deirdre J Murphy
BMJ 2004 328: 311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Singh, M., Varma, R.
(2008). Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist
10: 38-41
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Thornton, M. J
(2006). Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: consider the value of a functionally intact perineum.. BMJ
333: 753-753
[Full text]
-
Ryan, D.
(2006). Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour: revisit the past.. BMJ
333: 753-754
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Awaiting the new generation of trained obstetricians
- David JR Hutchon
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2006
[Full text]
- Revisit the past
- Dermot Ryan
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2006
[Full text]
- Reducing second stage Caesarean Sections - need for a multi-pronged attack
- Parivakkam S Arunakumari
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2006
[Full text]
- Is the functionally intact female perineum less valuable than a reduced caesarian section rate?
- Michelle J Thornton
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2006
[Full text]
- A device to make labour assessment more objective
- Andrew D Weeks
bmj.com, 6 Oct 2006
[Full text]
- Caesarean Delivery in the Second Stage of Labour: An Indian Perspective
- Nirmala Rai, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2006
[Full text]
- Better training in instrumental delivery may reduce caesarean section rates
- John Kelly, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2006
[Full text]
- Re: Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour (Spencer et al BMJ 2006; 333: 613-4)
- Joan Melendez, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2006
[Full text]