Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:602 (16 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7568.602
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMarshall and Flyvbjerg's clinical review gives contradictory information about measuring the ankle-brachial pressure ratio in diabetic patients, as well as portraying an unrealistic picture of the assessment of peripheral arterial disease in them.1
Firstly, 10-15% of diabetic patients may have a falsely raised ankle-brachial pressure ratio because early calcification of the tunica media renders the arteries incompressible.2 This should not be solely relied on as an objective assessment criterion. The pole test is more accurate.3 The arteries of the foot and toes are comparatively spared in diabetes. Therefore other testssuch as the toe pressure index, analysis of Doppler wave form, pulse volume analysis, and transcutaneous oxygen measurementsare far better but can rarely be done outside specialist clinics.
Secondly, for practical reasons the ankle-brachial pressure ratio should be measured at the peroneal (fibular) artery rather than the posterior tibial artery or dorsalis pedis, as mentioned in the clinical review.
Saurabh Rai, vascular research fellow
University of Birmingham NHS Trust, Selly Oak, Birmingham B29 6JD saurabh_rai@hotmail.com