BMJ  2006;333:512 (9 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38961.597350.BE

Editorial

The Human Tissue Act

Reassurance for relatives, at a price

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

On 1 September 2006 the full provisions of the Human Tissue Act 2004 came into force. This represents the conclusion of the UK government's response to concerns about inappropriate retention of organs after postmortem examination, especially paediatric specimens. It introduces criminal sanctions to enforce valid consent and the proper handling of the deceased and their tissues, supported by a licensing system, overseen by the newly created Human Tissue Authority.

But the act does more than this. As part of a European Union directive, sections implemented in April 2006 enforced a licensing system for transplantable tissues. Public display of human tissues, such as the "Body Worlds" exhibition of Gunther von Hagens, will require written proof of consent before death and a Human Tissue Authority licence. An offence that can loosely be called "DNA theft" is also created, and restrictions are placed on the use and storage of tissues from the . . . [Full text of this article]

Royal College of Pathologists, London SW1 5AF
(pnf1@le.ac.uk)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Pathology departments are still holding human tissue, report says

Michael Day
BMJ 2008 337: a1713. [Extract] [Full Text]

One-time general consent for research on biological samples

David Wendler
BMJ 2006 332: 544-547. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Angell, E, Tarrant, C, Dixon-Woods, M (2009). Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?. J. Clin. Pathol. 62: 825-829 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more >>