Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:500 (2 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7566.500-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORVerhamme et al present their data and case for warning patients on spironolactone about an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.1 They use an electronic database and conditional logistic regression analysis with adjustments. We do not believe their conclusion, however, and will not alter our clinical practice.
From a population of 300 000, they identified 523 cases with upper gastrointestinal events, of which only 13 were currently taking spironolactone. Of these 13, nearly 70% were also on agents known to cause ulcers. Only 30 of the control population were currently taking spironolactone, but these controls were less likely to be taking ulcer causing drugs. Similarly, the control patients overall had significantly less comorbidity than the case patients.
Despite the efforts of regression analysis, basing a conclusion on such a small number of patients is meaningless. So will we warn patients about a risk of bleedingno, not due to
Eugene Campbell, research fellow
University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH eugene.campbell@nottingham.ac.uk
Anthony Shonde, research fellow, Stephen Foley, research fellow
University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH