BMJ  2006;333:499-500 (2 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7566.499-b

Letter

Where next for China?

User fees increase China's health challenges

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The editorial by Liu does not give adequate consideration to the policy option of health services at zero cost to users.¹ The evidence from China confirms previous evidence that introducing user fees for health care reduces use of health care and thereby adds to human misery.² For elderly people in China, medical cost (user fees) is the main reason for 40% of those not visiting a doctor and 75% of those not gaining admission to hospitals. Another argument against user fees is that it worsens health inequities.³ The human costs of prolonged illness at old age and the increase in long term health costs from delayed treatment are further disadvantages.

Even developed economies of Europe have steadfastly maintained some facet of a policy of zero user fees. In many, the only out of pocket expense is a partial payment for drugs.³ Developing countries, such as Sri Lanka and . . . [Full text of this article]

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM7 0BE adosaroj@hotmail.co.uk

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Meeting the needs of elderly people in China

Tuohong Zhang and Yude Chen
BMJ 2006 333: 363-364. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

China's health challenges

Tao Liu
BMJ 2006 333: 365. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action

Lucy Gilson and Di McIntyre
BMJ 2005 331: 762-765. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Is there hope for South Asia?

Zulfiqar Bhutta, Samiran Nundy, and Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 328: 777-778. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

User fees

Andrew Creese
BMJ 1997 315: 202-203. [Extract] [Full Text]

Online poll

Find out more >>