Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:446 (26 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7565.446-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORHunt captures a key dynamic in modern medicine.1 At all levels we seem to have two jobs: firstly, to do the job and see patients, and secondly, to prove that we have done this activity, and to an appropriate standard.
Doing the job is actually the core reason for doctors to exist. It is the hardest part of medicine. Meeting and dealing well with people with all their pathology and their personal particularities is hard work. By comparison with this, going to meetings is far easier.
To do our core job, doctors have to jump through multiple hoops of audit, quality assurance, clinical governance, appraisal, and now revalidation. There is no evidence that these time consuming activities do anything for patient care. There is no evidence that they measure what matters, or reliably discriminate good practice from poor practice. Indeed I propose that in their current form they
Peter G Davies, general practitioner principal
Keighley Road Surgery, Illingworth, Halifax HX2 9LL npgdavies@blueyonder.co.uk