Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:405-406 (26 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38945.464722.80
Evidence on diagnostic accuracy and precision is scant and hard to find
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The process of diagnosis is complex and poses many challenges to doctors and other clinicians attempting to practise in an evidence based manner. When making a diagnosis in patients who are already ill we should be able to draw on evidence about the accuracy of diagnostic tests. When trying to make an early diagnosis of presymptomatic disease in well people through population screening we rely on evidence from randomised trials on whether patients benefit from such screening. Looking for presymptomatic disease among patients with an unrelated disorder (case finding) or trying to generate a differential diagnosis for patients' signs and symptoms require different types of evidence. We need to match each question to the type of evidence by using a diagnostic strategy.
Furthermore, diagnosis seldom relies on a single test. Ideally a clinician would like to find valid evidence about a cluster of tests, including the clinical examination, along
Sharon E Straus, associate professor
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, T2N 4N1
(sharon.straus@utoronto.ca)
Read all Rapid Responses